OUR LAST BLOG POST

When I was in High School, I had four weeks to write a five-paragraph essay, and I thought it was hard to do that, I would always wait until the last minute to do it. Then, when I entered college, having to do a six to eight-page paper was definitely a change. It also didn’t help that I thought my writing was the weakest part of my college career. The process of writing my annotated bibliography was one of the worst times here in college because I procrastinated until the last minute to finish writing and submit it. After writing that, I learned about myself that I like to wait until the last minute to do things, and then I’m expected a great grade, and that’s not how things work in college. I needed to start having a schedule of when I was going to write parts of my paper rather than trying to do it at night. I started applying that to my other classes and my grades in my writing when beating other things I thought I was better at. Then came our first shitty draft, and I was excited because I wanted to show Dianna that my writing was better than what my annotated bibliography was. I started writing that a week before it was due, I started with a footprint of what I wanted to write about, and I just started writing. When I turned in that paper, I felt happy with what I submitted, and I learned how I like doing my papers. I might be leaving this English class, but don’t worry; I will remember what I have learned throughout every book we have read and all of my revised work to put forth in my other class at Longwood University and my career in the future.

 

blog post 10

This semester, I have grown a lot as a writer. At the beginning of the semester, I was not confident in my writing and struggled to meet the academic expectations. I didnt always know how to organize my ideas or how to present them clearly. Over time, though, Ive become more confident and learned a lot about how to approach different types of writing.

I feel that one of the biggest changes Ive noticed is how much better I am at following different writing structures, especially for different subjects. For example, I have learned that social sciences use something called IMRaD, or Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussionwhereas for humanities or other areasyou should use an argumentative and analytical type of writing structureThese differences in requirement have prepared me for writing at different classes.

Now that I am more confident, I feel ready for any upcoming writing assignments. I have learned to use sources better and to cite them properly, which made my work well-organized and accurate. I dont feel as uncertain about how to approach assignments anymore.

This will also help me later on in college because now know that each subject has a different style of writing and I can adjust my writing to what the professors expect.

This will also help me in my future career. As a communication major, being able to write clearly is important, whether Im writing reports, proposals, or emails. Overall, this semester has made me a more confident writer, and I feel more prepared for future writing tasks in both school and my career. Thank you, Dr. Baldwin!

 

Blog post 9

Structure in the social sciences tends to vary depending on the type of content and information being presented but is largely based on logical organization. Quantitative studies, for instance, often follow the IMRaD format, which stands for Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion. This format provides a clear and systematic way to present research findings. The introduction outlines the research problem, objectives, and context, while the methods section explains how the study was conducted. Results detail the findings, often supported by tables or graphs, and the discussion interprets these findings in relation to broader implications or theories. Beyond IMRaD, other structural conventions commonly include elements such as conclusions, titles, abstracts, acknowledgments, references, and appendices, each of which serves a specific purpose in making the work more accessible and informative to the reader.

Language conventions in the social sciences refer to how language is used to communicate ideas effectively, often adapting to different audiences and genres. Active and passive voice are used strategically depending on the focus of the sentence. For example, active voice is typically preferred for clarity and directness (“The researchers conducted the survey”), while passive voice might be used to emphasize results or processes (“The survey was conducted”). Hedging is another important language convention, allowing authors to express uncertainty or caution in their claims. Phrases like “suggests that” or “may indicate” are commonly used to reflect the complexity and provisional nature of social science research.

Reference conventions are critical in social sciences for acknowledging sources and maintaining academic integrity. Most fields rely on the APA (Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association) style for consistency in citations. Reference practices include in-text documentation, which directly cites sources within the text, and techniques like summarizing and paraphrasing. While both involve rephrasing source material, summarizing condenses the main ideas, whereas paraphrasing rewrites the content in detail while maintaining the original meaning. These conventions ensure clarity, credibility, and the ability for readers to trace the origins of ideas or data.